Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, C.J.LAWSON wrote:
>
> > Well for what it is worth my own opinion is that 95 just like its forbears
> > is an app. loaded on dos and for this reason I think we should be talking
> > about whether or not dos is a true multi-tasking OS ... It certainly is
> > capable of becoming one. The question is, has it be implemented?
>
> Ever try Windows '98? Well, if you haven't, don't count on M$ ever
> learning how to design a real operating system. Yesterday I heard a
> commercial on the radio about Win98 being the OS of future businesses...
> Win98 runs one hell of a lot slower than Win95 and multitasks even worse..
> I don't know where M$ came up with Win98 running programs faster than
> Win95.. Win98 is a disaster; _never_ install it, it is a complete waste
> of time and money.
OK there we are, a genuine M$-Windoze == shit thread.
Cut it off please, if you want this type of discussion there are plenty
news groups filled with it. Let's keep this a _useful_ list.
Eric Meijer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: