Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, C.J.LAWSON wrote:
> Well for what it is worth my own opinion is that 95 just like its forbears
> is an app. loaded on dos and for this reason I think we should be talking
> about whether or not dos is a true multi-tasking OS ... It certainly is
> capable of becoming one. The question is, has it be implemented?
Ever try Windows '98? Well, if you haven't, don't count on M$ ever
learning how to design a real operating system. Yesterday I heard a
commercial on the radio about Win98 being the OS of future businesses...
Win98 runs one hell of a lot slower than Win95 and multitasks even worse..
I don't know where M$ came up with Win98 running programs faster than
Win95.. Win98 is a disaster; _never_ install it, it is a complete waste
of time and money.
Maybe Gates should fire all the so-called programmers and hire a few
monkeys to get the job done! <I guess that comment was a little harsh,
but necessay to get the point across>
-Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: