Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Cc: "Rev. Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 23:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980412233611.15209f-100000@calvin.shorelink.com>
In-reply-to: <87btu6ffyo.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>

Also, I now see what you ment by your "ticking time-bomb" comment.  If you
change the symlinks, user programs are no longer in sync with glibc. This
can, as Linus pointed out in your quoted text, cause "interesting"
failures though I might prefer the term "spectacular results".



George Bonser

If I had a catchy quip, it would be here.

http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
Next by Date: Re: Hi
Previous by thread: Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
Next by thread: Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread